GENEVA: The U.N.’s top human rights body on Friday passed a resolution backed by the European Union seeking quick and enhanced scrutiny of alleged violations in Belarus by authorities under President Alexander Lukashenko, after rejecting efforts to squelch speakers and water down the text.
The Human Rights Council voted 23-2 with 22 abstentions on the resolution that calls on the U.N. human rights chief to look into the situation of rights in the former Soviet republic and report back by year-end. The 47-member body rejected 17 amendments that had sought to alter the language.
The vote followed a dramatic urgent debate in which Belarus and backers like China, Russia and Venezuela sought to muzzle speakers like Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, a former English teacher who placed second to Lukashenko in the country’s disputed presidential election last month.
The four countries had, in essence, argued a breach of procedural rules by letting her and others speak. Council president Elisabeth Tichy-Fisslberger, the Austrian ambassador in Geneva, allowed speakers to continue decrying a string of alleged rights violations in Belarus.
The councils consideration of the recent events in Belarus is timely, U.N. human rights chief Michelle Bachelet said in remarks delivered by her deputy. Peaceful mass demonstrations have continued to contest the declared result of last months presidential elections.
We are witnessing thousands of arrests. Hundreds of reports of torture and other ill-treatment, including sexual violence and the reported torture of children, Bachelet’s statement said, referring to a police crackdown on post-election protests plus troubles from a decade ago. Excellencies, it is vital for the future of Belarus to break these cycles of increasing repression and violence.
In a dramatic showdown at the normally staid council, Belarus’ ambassador, Yury Ambrazevich, took the floor to insist that allowing U.N. human rights advocates and other speakers to address the council violated the rules, arguing that only national envoys should be allowed to speak. The council president overrode the objections.
Ambrazevich broke in briefly seconds after Tsikhanouskaya said in a video message that peaceful protesters were being deliberately beaten and raped in Belarus while some have been found dead.
“We request that the intervention by Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya be stopped,” the Belarusian ambassador said, referring to the opposition leader and her remarks.
Council president Tichy-Fisslberger brushed off the appeal, and the former presidential candidate finished her statement.
Ambrazevich, in his more elaborate response, shot back, faulting the “mass media and social networks” for showing a lopsided picture of reality presented by the losers in the elections.
We deny the unfounded accusations of sexual violence against protesters. There is no official record of this. There is no confirmation also of claims that people disappeared in association with the protests, he said. As with regards to political detentions, this has not taken place. Some people have been taken into custody in compliance with the legal procedural code.
In the debate, several European Union countries spoke out in favor of the speakers and decried rights violations in Belarus. The resolution presented by Germany raises concerns about torture, arbitrary deprivations of life, and sexual and gender-based violence linked to the Aug. 9 election.
The resolution also cited alleged intimidation, harassment and detention of opponents of Lukashenko’s government before and after the election. The autocratic Lukashenko, who has ruled the ex-Soviet republic for 26 years, was declared the winner, but opposition activists have challenged the election as rigged.
The European Union and the U.S. government have called the vote neither free nor fair and urged the government to enter a dialogue with the opposition as post-election protests continue.
The German resolution calls for Bachelet to look into recent violations and report back to the council by year-end. That would entail a relatively fast-track response for the often deliberate and slow-moving council.
Germanys move suggested speed was among its priorities. The resolution stops short of seeking more onerous, in-depth measures in the councils arsenal, such as deploying a fact-finding mission or assembling a panel of experts to examine the situation.
The text cites allegations of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment by law enforcement and prison officials. It calls on Belarus authorities to cease the use of excessive force against peaceful demonstrators and stop arbitrary arrests on political grounds and release all political prisoners, journalists and others detained around the election cycle.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor
Comments
0 comment