Top government sources said the Supreme Court’s Monday verdict upholding the Centre’s decision to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, shows that the “move was legal”.
“We welcome the decision. (It shows that) the abrogation of Article 370 was not wrong at all. It was done within the legal parameters. Earlier executed by Parliament, it has now been endorsed by the SC,” said sources.
The SC said that steps should be taken to conduct elections in the assembly by September 30 next year. The apex court also directed that statehood to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir be restored at the earliest.
Today's Supreme Court verdict on the abrogation of Article 370 is historic and constitutionally upholds the decision taken by the Parliament of India on 5th August 2019; it is a resounding declaration of hope, progress and unity for our sisters and brothers in Jammu, Kashmir and…— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) December 11, 2023
“The government is ready to carry out elections within the stipulated period. Statehood will be granted as per promises made to the court and people of Kashmir,” said sources.
Writing the judgement for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant, Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said Article 370 of the Constitution was a temporary provision and the president has the power to revoke it.
The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir on August 5, 2019. On that day, the government abrogated Article 370 and bifurcated the state into two union territories — Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.
SC upholds abrogation of Article 370 as constitutionally validWaqar Bhatti, (@WaqarHBhatti14) Political Analyst shares his views on the verdict@Zakka_Jacob @RShivshankar #Article370 #JammuAndKashmir pic.twitter.com/Nn3GA3oncj
— News18 (@CNNnews18) December 11, 2023
The erstwhile state does not have internal sovereignty different from other states of the country, the CJI said. “… all provisions of the Indian Constitution can be applied to J-K,” the CJI said. “We hold the exercise of presidential power to issue constitutional order abrogating Article 370 of Constitution as valid,” the CJI said.
Jammu and Kashmir became an integral part of India and this is evident from Articles 1 and 370, he said while pronouncing the judgment. “The Constituent Assembly of J&K was never intended to be permanent body,” the CJI stated. Article 370, Justice Chandrachud said, was an interim arrangement due to war conditions in the erstwhile state.
The princely state had become an integral part of India and this is evident from Articles 1 and 370, the CJI said.
In his concurring judgment, Justice Khanna said the purpose of Article 370 was to slowly bring Jammu and Kashmir at par with other Indian states. He directed the setting up of a truth-and-reconciliation commission to probe human rights violations both by the state and non-state actors.
With PTI Inputs
Comments
0 comment